Japan Video Games Blog

TO THOSE WHO DON'T WANT THEIR WORK PROMOTED

Hey guys and gals! We FIND and PROMOTE people's work, we never take credit for things we haven't written, we just love sharing the things that are interesting, but if you don't want your work or pictures shown, please let me know and I'll take it off, we're not trying to harm any one here or infringe on anyone's copyrights, just late night entertainment for my friends and I after a long days of work.

We're not making money off the site, nor are we publishing anything to other places through feedburner claiming that it's our work, just a hobby of finding cool things around the internet, that's all. Sometimes we copy and paste too quickly and a link giving you credit doesn't appear, if that's the case and you DO want your work promoted, we will add in the backlink, we would love to give credit where credit is due!

Please contact me or drop a comment on any posts you guys don't want up and I'll take it off within 24 hours, thanks!

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Diet Overkill: 25 Of the Most Ridiculous (and Ineffective) Popular Diets

Some people will do anything to lose weight, even if it means defying common sense and nutrition. But just because your best friend's cousin lost 20 pounds by drinking hot-peppered lemonade doesn't mean you should do the same. These 25 diets are not only ridiculous, they're ineffective and even dangerous.

  1. Atkins: Although wildly popular, and quite effective for some people, the Atkins diet is just not sustainable for most dieters. This diet cuts out healthy foods like fruit, and adopts a limited list of foods that are often high in fat and otherwise unhealthy. Above all, this diet's extreme restriction makes it incredibly difficult for most people to stick with it.
  2. The Subway diet: Substituting large, unhealthy meals with a wholesome sandwich is certainly an effective way to lose weight. However, the execution of the Subway diet is what makes this one a failure. This may come as a surprise to some, but not every sandwich at Subway is a dietary winner. You can't eat 14 meatball subs a week and expect to see pounds come off. For this diet to succeed, you'd have to eat very specific items from Subway's menu and keep up a strict regimen of exercise. This diet is useless because it's just as easy to make your own sandwich and take a walk.
  3. Cabbage soup diet: Also known as the "Russian peasant diet," the "Sacred Heart diet," and "TJ miracle soup diet," this diet consists of eating a low-calorie cabbage soup for 7 days. It's generally claimed to cause weight loss of 10 pounds within a week, although most experts believe that sort of weight loss is not possible. Most of the weight lost on this diet is water, so it's not permanent. It's also problematic because of a high sodium content, extremely low protein, feelings of weakeness, and increased flatulence.
  4. The tapeworm diet: Almost too disgusting to detail, this diet involves swallowing cysts that you've dissected out of beef carcass. The plan is to allow the tapeworm to live in you for up to 10 weeks, and then take prescribed medication to kill it. It should go without saying that this is perhaps one of the most dangerous diets you can adopt. It not only requires you to ingest a parasite, it encourages unhealthy eating habits, which are almost guaranteed to make you gain every pound back once the worm is gone.
  5. The cereal diet: Like the Subway diet, the cereal diet is silly because it requires you to buy a specific food substitute, and eat it on a regular basis. This diet isn't effective because of the high quality nutrition cereal offers-cereal is generally full of sugar-but rather because you're required to measure the amount of food you're eating. No matter what your diet, monitoring and carefully measuring food to restrict calories will make you lose weight. You don't need a special cereal to do so.
  6. The low fat diet: Nearly everyone has purchased a low or no fat product because we believe that somehow it's healthier and will help keep the pounds off. But the dirty trick about the low fat diet is that these products aren't healthier at all-often, you trade fat for more sugar, sodium, or calories. Sometimes, serving sizes are skewed to make an otherwise unhealthy food look better than before.
  7. Hallelujah diet: Reverend George M. Malkmus was diagnosed with colon cancer, and instead of getting treatment, he changed his diet to "the original diet God gave mankind." Although the diet consists mainly of good staples like fruits and vegetables, you can't just eat produce you'd pick up at the store. No, this diet requires that you mail-order direct from the Reverend's farm because the general American food supply is devoid of nutrients. Ironically, this diet has been found to cause nutrient deficiencies, and due to its high-fiber and beta carotine content, is less than ideal for cancer patients.
  8. South Beach Diet: Although it's created and promoted by a cardiologist, the South Beach diet is less than ideal. This diet takes you through phases of high restriction and lower restriction, constantly keeping your body on a roller coaster of losing and maintaining weight. Once you begin to regain pounds, you go back to the more restricted phase. Yo-yo diets such as this one are not only ineffective, they're dangerous to your heart and overall health.
  9. Slim Fast: Again, another product-based diet that offers little more than ineffective substitution. In the short term, you will probably see weight loss, but Slim Fast's shakes and bars are not mentally or physically satisfying enough for the diet to be sustained, especially when you consider that there are healthier, cheaper, and tastier alternatives out there.
  10. The chocolate diet: As studies have come out promoting chocolate as a supplement to a healthy diet, the chocolate diet has come out as well. This diet focuses on decreased calorie consumption with liquid chocolate diet shakes. It acts as a vitamin replacement, and although effective in the short term, has not been found to stimulate metabolism or burn fat, as the diet claims. Rather, any weight lost is a direct effect of decreased caloric intake.
  11. The Fiengold diet: Dr. Benjamin Feingold created a diet free of chemicals believed to cause ADD and ADHD. This included not only food, but also certain drugs and hygiene items. Although this diet is not physically harmful, and can be helpful in some instances, it's generally not wise to adopt this regimen. Critics warn against teaching children that food can dictate performance and behavior, and depriving them of appropriate professional help from doctors.
  12. The Weight Loss Cure They Don't Want You to Know About: This diet gives the tapeworm a run for its money. Why? The weight loss "cure" consists of nothing more than ingesting the urine of pregnant women. Whether this is effective or not really doesn't matter-there is absolutely, positively, a better way to lose weight than injecting yourself with pee.
  13. The blood type diet: This confusing diet requires that you eat according to your blood type. For example, if you're a blood Type A, that means vegetables are your ideal food. The main reason why this diet works at all is because-you guessed it-you're limiting what you eat. Of course, this can be achieved through portion control, and you can eat what you feel like whether you're a "hunter," "nomad," "cultivator," or any combination thereof.
  14. The Hollywood diet: It should be obvious that drinking nothing but juice is bound to leave you hungry and unsatisfied, but many continue to attempt to use this quick-fix detox program as a way to permanently lose weight. Unfortunately, that's just not going to happen. This juice has a high sugar content, and nearly all of the weight you'll lose is water, which will come right back.
  15. The Grapefruit diet: This horrible diet is simply unsustainable, offering little nutrition calories, or taste. Even worse, excessive consumption of this acidic citrus fruit could lead to a stomach ulcer. Additionally, grapefruit juice is dangerous when mixed with some medications.
  16. Russian Air Force diet: With this diet, you can put a number of herbs, sauces, and spices on your food, but you'll have a hard time finding a place for all of those extras to land, considering breakfast is coffee, lunch is two eggs and a tomato, and dinner is salad and tiny portion of meat. This simple caloric restriction is just not sustainable, leaving dieters hovering near starvation, and it has a high sodium content.
  17. The master cleanse : Also known as the lemon water detox diet, this concoction can't even really be called a diet because you're not eating anything. With the master cleanse, you'll subsist on lemon water with cayenne pepper and maple syrup. Incredibly temporary, any weight loss resulting from this detox will come back almost immediately.
  18. The macrobiotic diet: This diet consists primarily of grains, vegetables, and beans, specifically avoiding processed and refined foods. It also requires thorough chewing before swallowing to avoid overeating. Although this is overall good diet advice, the problem with the macrobiotic diet is that it's often presented as a "cure" for cancer, while many long-term macrobiotics have developed and died from cancer.
  19. The Kimkins diet: This Atkins with a twist requires that dieters follow a strict caloric restriction, which as you must know by now, is nothing special. Additionally, this diet is wrapped up in scandal, as the creator claimed to have lost 198 pounds in 6 months, but later gained it all back, and tried to hide this fact from other dieters.
  20. The magnetic diet: This diet follows the concept that all foods have magnetism that attracts either health or disease. It requires that you drink only water and eat specific foods with "invigorating magnetism," and follow an eating schedule that creates a caloric deficit. Despite all of the quackery surrounding the diet, it's actually a very simple method of eating nutritious foods like fruit, vegetables, and whole grains, combined with portion control and exercise.
  21. The hot dog diet: Also known as the three-day diet, this diet is ridiculous because it doesn't recommend that you eat healthy food-in fact, you'll eat ice cream as well. Instead, you'll eat carefully counted portions of food, resulting in the oh-so-familiar calorie restriction that so many ridiculous diets feature.
  22. The apple cider vinegar diet: The apple cider vinegar diet succeeds only in making dieters not want to eat at all, mostly because you're just not likely to be hungry after downing straight vinegar. You drink a few teaspoons of vinegar, which is supposed to supress your appetite. The secret is not that apple cider vinegar is particularly helpful for weight loss, but because reducing portions and exercising are.
  23. Dr. Siegal’s cookie diet: The cookie diet is a lot less appealing than it sounds. Like Subway, Slim Fast, and other weight loss fads, this diet requires that you eat specific foods that must be purchased separate from a regular diet. These cookies are high protein, but there's really nothing special about the diet except that it's extremely low in calories. What's more, you're likely to get very tired of eating cookies day in and day out.
  24. Wu-Yi Tea diet: Although it's presented as a natural cure endorsed by Oprah and Rachel Ray, that couldn't be farther from the truth about Wu-Yi tea. There's absolutely nothing special about this particular tea. It's just oolong tea, and it offers no more benefits than the tea you can pick up at your grocery or health store.
  25. The Martha's Vineyard diet: Just like the Hollywood diet, this detox requires that you drink nothing but juice for a specific period of time. Again, this will only help you lose weight in the short term, and you'll gain every pound back once you realize there's more to life than drinking vegetable juice all day.
Blogged with the Flock Browser

2 comments:

Admin said...

Thank you for sharing this article. The Kimkins Diet is not only full of scandal; it is also a very dangerous starvation diet, promoting anorexic behavior.

For more information on the Kimkins Diet Scam, be sure to check out the ConsumerAffairs.com article and see what about.com has to say about it.

Even Woman's World Magazine has issued an apology for their part in promoting the dangerous scam.

Say NO to Kimkins!

Marcia said...

The Fiengold diet: Dr. Benjamin Feingold created a diet free of chemicals believed to cause ADD and ADHD. This included not only food, but also certain drugs and hygiene items. Although this diet is not physically harmful, and can be helpful in some instances, it's generally not wise to adopt this regimen. Critics warn against teaching children that food can dictate performance and behavior, and depriving them of appropriate professional help from doctors.

Dr. Feingold, Chief of Allergy at the Kaiser-Permanente Medical Center, did not believe that some additives "cause" ADD and ADHD (or "hyperactivity" and "learning disabilities" as they were previously called).

What he found in his clinical work was that for some individuals who are especially sensitive, certain foods/synthetic food additives can "trigger" these symptoms. As all allergists know, a person can react adversely to even a common substance (cats, peanuts, pollen, shellfish, dairy). If a child has a serious reaction to peanuts it would be irresponsible for a parent to ignore it or fail to educate the child on this issue.

Another thing allergists know is that if you suspect you may be sensitive to a particular thing you can test this out by temporarily removing it and observe any changes. If there is no difference once the item is removed then you can add it back. But if there is a significant improvement when you take it away, then you have a good idea that the substance might be triggering problems. You can run a challenge if you wish, where you once again eat a particular food, and see if the problems return. This is the basis of the time-honored elimination diet.

If there are many potential offenders, it can seem overwhelming; what the Feingold program does is provide a systematic way a person can run such a test.

Actually, most of the items we suggest removing are not really foods at all; they are additives synthesized from petroleum. I'm sure you've seen "yellow #5" on ingredient labels. What is not disclosed on the label is that this food dye is created from crude oil. In fact most of the yellow dye now in use originates in petroleum refineries in China.

Because tartrazine (yellow #5) has long been recognized as a problem for sensitive individuals, the Food and Drug Administration originally mandated that manufacturers list it by name on ingredient labels. Linked to aspirin sensitivity, it is the number one dye allergists name as problematic for their patients.

A look at the medical journal articles on this dye will show that it has been found to cause many problems:
damage to the immune system, reproductive damage, behavior problems, headaches, asthma, hives and nerve damage. (See www.diet-studies.com or www.feingold.org)

Since it's quite easy to find foods of every kind that do not contain dyes and other petrochemicals, the question should not be "Why should I avoid giving my child this chemical?" but rather it should be "Why should any parent feed this to their child?"

A growing number of professionals in Great Britain are asking this very question. Their awareness comes as a result of the recent study from the University of Southampton that showed a modest dose of food dyes and one preservative resulted in ADHD behaviors in the general population, not just children with a diagnosis.

As for our children becoming neurotic about what they eat....in the 33 years I have been involved in this work I have never heard of this happening. My family began the Feingold diet in 1975 and my 5 year-old daughter didn't even know she was on a "special diet." When a family uses the Feingold program the parents take care of the grocery shopping and meal preparation, not the children. All my daughter saw was that she continued to enjoy the same type of food she always had, including treats.

Once it became obvious that a single gum ball made her wild and out of control, as did a bright pink Slurpee, etc. then it was time to teach her why and show her how to handle occasions when other people offered her food with these chemicals. When she learned that the additives we eliminate came from the same source as gasoline, it was a no-brainer...she quickly decided that stuff is gross. She didn't like eating petrol and didn't like acting crazy; it was empowering for her to be able to make good choices.

We show families how to run the initial test to determine if certain things are triggering problems. Once a child is established on the program parents are encouraged to let the child decide if he wants to eat or avoid those problematic chemicals/foods. (Of course, the child's age and the severity of any reaction are major factors.) It's not unusual for a child to occasionally go off his diet, and we even suggest strategies for planned cheats. But if the child makes this choice he lives with the consequences. This is just good parenting.

The parents we help don't spend much time "teaching children that foods can dictate performance and behavior" as you write. We teach the families how to find the mac & cheese mix without the dye and the cookies without the fake flavoring. But these are bright kids and it doesn't take them long to figure out for themselves that every time they eat the lollipop from the teacher they have a really bad day and when they eat the lollipop from Mom they don't.

But perhaps the most damaging thing you have written about the Feingold diet is to say that we would ever "deprive them of appropriate professional help from doctors." We do not do this, nor have we ever done it!
Most families who contact us have been to many professionals and have not found help; typically they consider us a "last resort." Other families come to us because they are referred to us by their doctor.

We may be seeing more referrals now that the American Academy of Pediatrics has just written that our diet is an appropriate treatment.

But why would you think that it's an "either-or" situation. Whether or not a child sees a professional, he still has to eat. Why not feed him healthy food?

You quite accurately refer to our program as a popular diet. Hmmm, I wonder why. Perhaps it's because it has helped so many families for so many years. I don't know if you have ever been involved with a non-profit volunteer organization. In order for a volunteer organization to form, let alone continue for 33 years, it requires a "payoff" in the form of success and satisfaction. Would you spend 33 years of your life donating your time and effort for something that was damaging, unwise or unsuccessful? Neither would I.

Jane Hersey
National Director
Feingold Association the US
www.feingold.org

PS If you are anywhere near San Ramon, CA, at the end of March, one of our members whose background and credentials appear to be very similar to yours, will be presenting a seminar about the Feingold diet at the California Association of School Counselors' annual conference. Many of our members are professionals in the fields of: teaching, nursing, medicine, counseling, dietetics, chemistry, etc.

Marc and Angel Hack Life

Self Improvement

Personal Development with The Positivity Blog

HowStuffWorks: Health Daily RSS Feed

PickTheBrain | Smarter Self Improvement

I will change your life . com